REITs vs. Direct Ownership: Which Strategy Wins?

by Aida Nesimi

REITs vs. Direct Ownership: Which Strategy Wins?

Introduction

Real estate investment comes in many forms, but two stand out: direct ownership of property and Real Estate Investment Trusts (REITs). Both provide opportunities for income and appreciation—but they operate very differently.

If you’re debating whether to buy a duplex or invest in a REIT, this guide breaks down which strategy might win for your goals.


What Are REITs?

  • Publicly traded companies that own/manage income-producing real estate.

  • Investors buy shares like stock.

  • Dividends are paid from rental income and property profits.

Pros: Highly liquid, diversified, professional management.
Cons: No control, subject to stock market volatility.


What Is Direct Ownership?

  • Purchasing property yourself—single-family rentals, multifamily, commercial.

  • You control the asset and operations.

Pros: Full control, leverage opportunities, tax benefits.
Cons: Requires capital, active management, higher risk exposure.


Side-by-Side Comparison

Factor REITs Direct Ownership
Liquidity High (sell shares anytime) Low (must sell/refinance property)
Control None Full
Leverage None Yes
Tax Benefits Limited Significant (depreciation, 1031 exchanges)
Entry Cost Low ($100+) High (down payments, closing costs)

Which Wins?

  • Busy professionals → REITs for passive exposure.

  • Hands-on investors → Direct ownership for higher returns and control.

  • Balanced portfolios → A mix of both.


Call to Action

Want a blend of hands-on investing and passive income? Contact us to explore direct property deals and REIT allocations that fit your portfolio.

GET MORE INFORMATION

Name

Phone*

Message

- -

+1(954) 955-2298

aidanesimire@gmail.com